Posts Tagged ‘automotive’

Does Honda suffer from hubris?

There was a day when Honda was the most respected automobile manufacturer in the world. The cars were reliable, well built and solidly, if not spectacularly, designed. I looked forward to Honda advertising. It  had an irreverent tone that you might expect from a category leader.

Those days are gone. Today Honda is a company that makes…I’ll say it…boring cars. Admittedly, they’ve suffered a whack of bad luck recently, what with the tsunami, earthquake and floods in Thailand. But what they’ve suffered most from, in my opinion, is a series of cars that don’t arouse any emotional response. I’m not alone in this opinion. In today’s Globe and Mail, critic Michael Vaughan refers to Honda vehicles that “…ellicit[s] yawns from car reviewers”.

So here’s the curious part. Honda’s ad campaign, now running on major TV networks across Canada, leans heavily on a view of the brand that’s thoroughly 1990s – “It’s a Honda”. The strategy assumes that the word – and by extension the brand  – still has enough cache to lure buyers into showrooms. and ignores the advancements made by companies like Hyundai, Kia and more. All the buying public needs to hear today about the new cars is  “It’s a Honda”.  Wow, sign me up! Maybe in 1998. Not in 2011.

Honda is a brand that needs to work harder to earn the favour of Canadians. “I remember 20 years ago when Honda was the most awesome and exciting car company in the world”, states Vaughan. It’s time the marketing got up to speed, no?

Marketing of Chevy Volt is Vexing

As past creative lead for the AutoShow, I have been anticipating electric vehicles for longer than most. So it’s with considerable confusion – bordering on disdain – that I’ve watched the new marketing roll-out for the Chevrolet Volt.

While not the only purpose, the goal of introducing of electric vehicles is to reduce our dependence on gasoline. The price of oil has skyrocketed and shows no signs of slowing down. The worldwide supply of oil will eventually run out, if we don’t destroy the earth’s ozone layer via the release of greenhouse gases first. My point is, there’s a great opportunity here for GM to lead, to show the world that electric is a viable alternative, that as a company GM is moving boldly into the future, and in the process, adding relevance to the brand.

So how are they marketing Chevy Volt? As the electric car with no limitations. What?! They invest millions to “perfect” the electric technology and then launch it as the electric car that will “take you further”? It takes you further because it’s got…you guessed it…a gas-powered back-up engine! Does this not strike you as back-assed? It’s as if GM is saying, “Don’t let the electricity dissuade you, because it’s got gas to make up for it.” Surely there’s a better story here. The technology. The vision. How buying one is smart, responsible and shows personal leadership. Something!

If you are considering a Volt, it’s because you believe in electric vehicles, Inherently, these consumers are willing to give up certain things to do what they believe is the right thing. At least that’s the way I see it.

Is Mini brand extension a reach?

So there I am, driving. In the lane next to me there’s a Mini. Not just any Mini, but a Mini Countryman, the newest model in the Mini line-up. There were four adults in it – two in front, two more in back. You see, the Mini Countryman is actually not mini. It’s not maxi either. It’s…well, in between. There was something just not right about it. It caused to me think, “Is this a brand extension that’s just not meant not to be?”

The success of the Mini can be traced to the essential design of the vehicle – compact, sporty with a wide stance – an unmistakable presence on the road. Size is so much a part of its success, so much a part of the brand’s DNA that messing with it seems somewhat desperate. “If we can’t get more people to buy a Mini because it’s small, why don’t we simply make a bigger Mini?” Or so the reasoning seems to be.

What makes a Mini a Mini is the fact that it’s…mini. I hypothesize that people who buy a Mini do so for the very reason it’s not a sedan that can carry four adults. I just can’t see Charlize Theron driving a Countryman in the Italian Job, complete with Mark Wahlberg and Jason Statham in the back. People love the brand for what it is – a zippy sports car powered by distinct style and history.

Brand extensions work. Sometimes, however, they go beyond their reach by undermining what made the brand so successful in the first place. I’m thinking the Mini Countryman is one of them.

What do you think?

GM taking a page from Ford?

As reported in Marketing Magazine, General Motors has made a concerted effort to make their presence felt at this year’s South by Southwest. SXSW is a combination of interactive, film and music festivals and conferences which take place in Austin, Texas every spring. It’s also where technologies such as Twitter have made their grand introduction to the world.

In what GM is calling “test pilots”, the Chevrolet brand has aligned itself with Austin-based Gowalla—a similar service to Foursquare—allowing mobile users to check-in for SXSW-related messages and offers. Air travelers can also check-in at the airport to request a free lift downtown in a Chevrolet Equinox. Other strategies include the application of QR-codes on the hoods of Chevy vehicles which, once scanned with your mobile device, lead you to a microsite for that specific vehicle plus, GM’s own version of the Ford Fiesta Movement.

All this is part of General Motors’ turn to digital, of which they plan to commit 30% of their annual marketing budget. So far, a big splash, but what’s up their sleeves for the rest of year?